Local elections often fly under the radar in Newton. Compared to the 73% turnout in the 2024 general election, turnout in 2023 was under 25%.Given the fine margins that result from this low turnout, there is a strong incentive for last-minute smear campaigns over marginal differences that degrade our discourse. However, there are also moments when candidates demonstrate harmful views and poor leadership that rise to the level of principled critique. John Chaimanis’ 2024 comments regarding trans youth and 2025 response fall into this latter category. As concerned neighbors who have done our diligence, we encourage Newtonians to support the other two candidates in the race.
For those who are learning about this controversy for the first time, this guest letter to the Newton Beacon describes it well:
“In comments made on the Facebook page ‘Newton Civic Action Forum’ on September 27, 2024, Chaimanis suggests that trans youth in bathrooms and locker rooms are a threat to other students and that teaching about gender identity ‘forces’ children to question themselves. He repeatedly misgenders transgender youth and frames them as ‘boys in girls’ spaces.’”
Another article in the Newton Beacon published on October 6, 2025, also provides the context. The article contains Chaimanis’ response to the controversy, in which he states:
“My goal was to become a more informed parent, and to understand how to support all children… Since then, I have learned that some of the ways I worded my concerns were hurtful. That was never my intention, and I am sorry for any pain or harm I caused. These are complex issues, and I share genuine concern and compassion for all people affected as we respectfully work through these and other challenging topics. We need to continue to ask honest questions, learn from one another, and grow together without fear of judgment.”
We encourage folks to read his full statement in the article.
While Chaimanis’s acknowledgement of the harm his comments caused is a step in the right direction, it does not restore confidence in his ability to affirm the dignity of our most vulnerable neighbors or unify our community.
First, his apology does not reference how his views on trans issues have changed since the controversy. Is he apologetic about the phrasing of his harmful views or has he reevaluated his views and changed them? At best, Chaiminis’s statement lacks the details to assuage our concerns that he did the self-reflection he claims. At worst, the statement is a well-crafted way to save face without committing to being an ally to trans people. Chaimanis could have explicitly committed to upholding trans rights and protecting trans students. However, the absence of this message is noticeable and we encourage him to rectify this omission.
Second, even if Chaimanis has changed his views, his choice of rhetoric in 2024 and failure to clarify his views in 2025 represent a lack of judgement that may repeat on the City Council. The need for prudent leadership is more important in Newton now than perhaps ever, given the rising vitriol in our local politics and hostile federal government. In 2024, if it were true that Chaimanis was “just asking questions,” he did not do so with the sensitivity and grace of a prospective City Councilor. In 2025, after his response, do you still trust him to articulate thoughtful, humble, and compassionate perspectives on social issues? If he was on the Council in 2023, during the protests against a drag show at Newton North, could you trust him to do the right thing? We do not believe he has done enough to earn that trust.
When letters like this one go out close to an election, they are easy to dismiss as smear campaigns. As progressives who want to improve our public discourse, our intent is to recognize John Chaimanis’s public statements and use them to project how he would be a public leader. He can clarify his views before the election to address our concerns, but until then, we encourage voters to support other candidates that appeal to the better angels of our nature.
-Progressive Newton Steering Committee




